This can be description associated with several types of paper at COLING 2018

This can be description associated with several types of paper at COLING 2018

It is essential to find the paper that is right so that you can assist get high quality reviews for the work. Observe that all paper kinds utilize the template that is same download your message and LaTeX templates right here: coling2018.zip

Computationally-aided linguistic analysis

The main focus with this paper kind is brand brand new insight that is linguistic. It could take the type of an empirical research of some linguistic sensation, or of a theoretical outcome of a linguistically-relevant formal system.

  1. Relevance: Is it paper relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: Through the real means the paper is written, are you able to inform just what research concern had been addressed, that which was done and exactly why, and exactly how the outcomes connect with the investigation concern?
  3. Originality: How initial and revolutionary may be the research described? Originality might be within the question that is linguistic addressed, within the methodology put on the linguistic concern, or in the mixture for the two.
  4. Technical correctness/soundness: may be the extensive research described in the paper theoretically sound and proper? Is one to trust the claims associated with the paper—are they sustained by the analysis or experiments as they are the total results precisely interpreted?
  5. Reproducibility: will there be adequate information for some body in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcomes? n/a for many kinds of theoretical results
  6. Data/code supply: may be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or perhaps is there a compelling explanation provided why this isn’t feasible?
  7. Generalizability: Does the paper show exactly exactly how the outcomes generalize, either by deepening our comprehension of some system that is linguistic basic or by showing methodology which can be put on other issues also? n/a for several forms of theoretical results
  8. Significant comparison: Does the paper clearly position the described make use of respect to current literary works? Could it be clear both what’s novel into the research presented and just how it develops on earlier in the day work?
  9. Substance: Does this paper have sufficient substance for a paper that is full-length or would it not take advantage of further development?
  10. General suggestion: there are lots of good submissions contending for slots at COLING 2018; essential will it be to feature that one? Will people discover a complete lot by looking over this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is way better to vary research topics for psychology from other reviewers rather than grade every thing in the centre.

NLP engineering test paper

This paper kind fits the majority of submissions at current CL and NLP seminars.

  1. Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: Through the real method the paper is written, are you able to inform exactly just what research concern had been addressed, the thing that was done and just why, and exactly how the outcomes relate solely to the study concern?
    1. Can it be clear what the authors’ hypothesis is? The facts? A text input reponse
    2. Will it be clear the way the writers have actually tested their theory? y/n
  3. Originality: How initial and revolutionary may be the extensive research described? Observe that originality could include a brand new method or an innovative new task, or it may lie when you look at the careful analysis of what goes on whenever a understood strategy is put on a known task (in which the pairing is novel) or within the careful analysis of what are the results whenever a known strategy is put on a understood task in a brand new language.
  4. Technical correctness/soundness: could be the extensive research described in the paper theoretically sound and proper? Is one to trust the claims regarding the paper—are they supported by the analysis or experiments and they are the total results precisely interpreted?
    1. Could it be clear the way the total outcomes confirm/refute the theory, or will be the outcomes inconclusive?
    2. Perform some authors explain the way the outcomes follow from their hypothesis (rather than state, other feasible confounding element)?
    3. Would be the datasets used plainly described and they are they suitable for testing the theory as previously mentioned?
  5. Reproducibility: can there be adequate information for some body in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcome?
  6. Data/code access: may be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or perhaps is here a compelling explanation offered why it is not feasible?
  7. Error analysis: Does the paper provide a thoughtful mistake analysis, which actively seeks linguistic habits into the forms of mistakes created by the system(s) assessed and sheds light on either avenues for future work or even the way to obtain the strengths/weaknesses regarding the systems?
  8. Significant contrast: Does the paper clearly spot the described make use of respect to literature that is existing? Could it be clear both what’s novel when you look at the research presented and just how it develops on earlier in the day work?
  9. Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for the paper that is full-length or would it not take advantage of further work?
  10. General suggestion: there are numerous good submissions contending for slots at COLING 2018; essential could it be to feature that one? Will people discover a complete great deal by looking over this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is much better to vary from other reviewers rather than grade every thing at the center.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *